Descriptive analytics related to sexual behavior of full try and the 3 subsamples out-of energetic pages, previous pages, and low-users
Are solitary reduces the amount of unprotected full sexual intercourses
In regard to the number of partners with whom participants had protected full sex during the last year, the ANOVA revealed a significant difference between user groups (F(2, 1144) = , P 2 = , Cramer’s V = 0.15, P Figure 1 represents the theoretical model and the estimate coefficients. The model fit indices are the following: ? 2 = , df = 11, P 27 the fit indices of our model are not very satisfactory; however, the estimate coefficients of the model resulted statistically significant for several variables, highlighting interesting results and in line with the reference literature. In Table 4 , estimated regression weights are reported. The SEM output showed that being active or former user, compared to being non-user, has a positive statistically significant effect on the number of unprotected full sexual intercourses in the last 12 months. The same is for the age. All the other independent variables do not have a statistically significant impact.
Production away from linear regression model typing group, matchmaking apps utilize and you can aim of installation details because the predictors getting what number of secure full sexual intercourse’ partners among productive users
Productivity off linear regression model typing market, relationships apps use and you may objectives out-of setting up parameters due to the fact predictors for exactly how many safe complete sexual intercourse’ people certainly productive users
Hypothesis 2b A second multiple regression analysis was run to predict the number of unprotected full sex partners for active users. The number of unprotected full sex partners was set as the dependent variable, while the same demographic variables and dating apps usage and their motives for app installation variables used in the first regression analysis were entered as covariates. The final model accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in the number of unprotected full sex partners among active users (R 2 = 0.16, Adjusted R 2 = 0.14, F-change(step one, 260) = 4.34, P = .038). In contrast, looking for romantic partners or for friends, and being male were negatively associated with the number of unprotected sexual activity partners. Results are reported in Table 6 .
Wanting sexual lovers, many years of app usage, being heterosexual was indeed certainly in the quantity of unprotected full sex lovers
Production off linear regression model typing demographic, dating software need and you can motives out-of installment parameters since the predictors to have the amount of exposed complete sexual intercourse’ people among active users
In search of sexual couples, numerous years of application use, being heterosexual have been seriously regarding the quantity of unprotected complete sex partners
Efficiency of linear regression model typing market, relationships programs incorporate and you can motives regarding set up variables given that predictors to own what number of unprotected full sexual intercourse’ lovers certainly one of active profiles
Hypothesis 2c A third multiple regression analysis was run, including demographic variables and apps’ pattern of usage variables together with apps’ installation motives, to predict active users’ hook-up frequency. The hook-up frequency was set as the dependent variable, while the same demographic variables and dating apps usage variables used in the previous regression analyses were entered as predictors. The final model accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in hook-up frequency among active users (R 2 = 0.24, Adjusted R 2 = 0.23, F-change(step 1, 266) = 5.30, P = .022). App access frequency, looking for sexual partners, having a CNM relationship style were positively associated with the frequency of hook-ups. In contrast, being heterosexual and https://kissbridesdate.com/no/russiske-bruder/ being of another sexual orientation (different from hetero and homosexual orientation) were negatively associated with the frequency of hook-ups. Results are reported in Table 7 .